Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id DAA07836 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 03:47:18 -0500 Message-Id: <199601220847.DAA07836@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by vms.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 3C7478A6 ; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 3:21:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 22:50:47 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: sera'aku SNU: ki'e doi skot. X-To: ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 1162 X-From-Space-Date: Mon Jan 22 03:47:21 1996 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU >> Lojban content words are going to be PREDOMINANTLY 3, 4, 5 or 6 >> syllables. ideally Zipf will work to make it possible to have the >> shortest words be the most common ones > >What's the mechanism for that? If a long lujvo starts getting used a >lot, how can it be abbreviated? 1. Most likely, people will use a less specific word with fewer terms. 2. People will leave out se/nu/ke terms in lujvo making 3. ultimately, people could ask for a gismu to be assigned to the word or to a major component of it that is used in many lujvo. (or in spontaneous use, of course, they just start using a gismu). These are in order of preference. I really doubtthat many long lujvo will be so overused as to get a gismu assigned. There will probably be some objective criteria to meet before I would accept such a word, say by comparing frequency of word use to average frequency of gismu and 2 term lujvo. But this in particular is one thing I could see being considered after the 5 year baseline ends - consideration to adding to gismu to shorten some high frequency long words (the long words needn't go away, they will just have a short synonym). lojbab