Message-Id: <199601260838.DAA20272@locke.ccil.org>
Date:         Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:35:07 0
Reply-To: colin@kindness.demon.co.uk
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Colin Fine <colin@kindness.demon.co.uk>
Organization: None
Subject:      Re: tech:ro broda/ro lo broda
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
Content-Length: 1049

In article: <822522493.13264.2@vms.dc.lsoft.com> pcliffje@crl.com
writes:


> pc:
> Semantically or logically (the second-order view of quantifiers) it
turns
> out that quantifiers and LE and several other creatures all belong to
the
> same general type of thing (the logicolinguists seem to prefer
> "determiner" for this sort).  That may be part of the reason that
people
> found it so natural (and the more complex _ro lo xirma_ less so).
>

I'm prepared to believe this, though I don't understand it. But in that
case structures like
        re lo xirma
and
        re lo ci xirma

would appear to be anomolous.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Colin Fine    33 Pemberton Drive, Bradford BD7 1RA  01274 733680     |
|                         colin@kindness.demon.co.uk                  |
|"There are no extraordinary people: There are only ordinary people   |
|doing extraordinary things with what they have been given" -K.B.Brown|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------