Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id CAA27786 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 02:03:41 +0200 Message-Id: <199601190003.CAA27786@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 6F148C07 ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 1:03:40 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 22:03:55 -0300 Reply-To: Paulo Barreto Sender: Lojban list From: Paulo Barreto Subject: Re: SNU: xorvo X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 730 Lines: 18 cu'u la lojbab >I then propose that you propose a type IV fu'ivla. I will suggest "xrvska" >as a natural. The weakness os that it has no rafsi, and that therefore you >need to ise "zei" to make a "lujvo". But this also may be remedied by an >unconvention that is still legal: xrvskagu'e is another type IV fu'ivla, >as would be xrvgu'e if you really want brevity. Nope. "xrvska" fails to be valid for two reasons: 1. The initial consonant cluster is not strictly made of valid initial pairs. 2. There is a forbiden sounded-unsounded cluster "vs". But I understand and agree with what you say. co'o mi'e paulos. Paulo S.L.M. Barreto -- Software Analyst *** PGP public key available *** e'osai ko sarji la lojban.