Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com ([205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id RAA08205 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 17:06:00 -0500 Message-Id: <199601202206.RAA08205@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by vms.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 6FB39E5B ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 1:46:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 22:03:55 -0300 Reply-To: Paulo Barreto Sender: Lojban list From: Paulo Barreto Subject: Re: SNU: xorvo To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Status: OR X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 730 X-From-Space-Date: Sun Jan 21 23:10:44 1996 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU cu'u la lojbab >I then propose that you propose a type IV fu'ivla. I will suggest "xrvska" >as a natural. The weakness os that it has no rafsi, and that therefore you >need to ise "zei" to make a "lujvo". But this also may be remedied by an >unconvention that is still legal: xrvskagu'e is another type IV fu'ivla, >as would be xrvgu'e if you really want brevity. Nope. "xrvska" fails to be valid for two reasons: 1. The initial consonant cluster is not strictly made of valid initial pairs. 2. There is a forbiden sounded-unsounded cluster "vs". But I understand and agree with what you say. co'o mi'e paulos. Paulo S.L.M. Barreto -- Software Analyst *** PGP public key available *** e'osai ko sarji la lojban.