Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id GAA20926 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 06:32:31 +0200 Message-Id: <199601100432.GAA20926@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 7FF68C0B ; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 5:32:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 1996 19:10:05 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: Veijo's 1994 proposal for nested relative clauses X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 396 Lines: 10 Veijo: > > "And what do we learn from this, comrades?" I'm not sure, but at any > > rate some further thinking is needed. Please comment! > I'd like to add this feature to the language. It offers a working > solution to a problem which people with an English background > don't mostly even perceive. Could we be reminded in a bit more detail of the nature of the problem? coo, mie lai and