From cowan Wed Jan 24 16:19:59 1996 Subject: Re: {lee}, {lohi} From: John Cowan To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 16:19:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199601241923.OAA12243@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Jan 24, 96 06:09:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Status: OR X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 548 Message-ID: la .and. cusku di'e > I am right, aren't I, that the official line on cmene is that they are > potentially nonce, ad hoc labels, and do not come with any promise that > they are to be found in any standard onomasticon? That is correct. "la fzzzzg." can be read as "le se cmene be zo fzzzzg bei mi" and analogously for "doi fzzzzg.". As a result, all uses of names in Lojban can be paraphrased away so that only uninterpreted words within quotation marks remain. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.