From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Tue Jan 16 05:39:37 1996
Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id FAA25726 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 05:39:35 -0500
Message-Id: <199601161039.FAA25726@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id A88C8764 ; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 5:12:13 -0500
Date:         Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:12:32 GMT
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      sera'aku SNU: ki'e doi skot.
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
Content-Length:  511


> 3) we are treading into an especially controversial ground with an example
> from the cultural gismu.

> They might not help with Croatia
> (or maybe they would - you could make some appropriate lujvo from
> X-Y-South-Slavic, where Goran and friends chose the X and the Y to be
> meaningful and non-offensive to their culture).

.i .uanaisai

Describing a culture as a two-part lujvo.  This seems an extraordinary idea.
Is it possible?  For instance, how does one do Irish?

.i co'omi'e dn.