Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id DAA22547 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 03:05:40 +0200 Message-Id: <199601180105.DAA22547@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id ED8BDC3C ; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 2:05:39 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:24:32 -0500 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: TECH QUERY: variant fu'ivla X-To: Lojban List To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199601170041.TAA02036@locke.ccil.org> from "Paulo Barreto" at Jan 16, 96 10:10:16 pm Content-Length: 683 Lines: 19 la paulos. joi mi cusku be di'e casnu > >A parallel situation exists in type 3 fu'ivla (those made with gismu-based > >prefixes): either a four-letter rafsi or a CCV rafsi can be used as the > >prefix (CVC and CVV rafsi aren't safe): > > I think you mean either a four-letter rafsi or a CVC rafsi, and that CCV and > CVV aren't safe: {pa dja,r,ki} -> {pad-jarki} Correct: the fingers get a little confused, typing alladem C's and V's. > > "ricrxacere" and "tricrxacere" > .ui You used the latin ablative to form the fu'ivla! Sic (or as they say in the West, hoc ille!) -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.