Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id PAA25570 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 15:21:53 +0200
Message-Id: <199601181321.PAA25570@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id C3B3E221 ; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 14:21:47 +0100
Date:         Thu, 18 Jan 1996 13:23:34 GMT
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: TECH QUERY: variant fu'ivla
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 245
Lines: 10

> >So far, the Lojban community hasn't taken a position on whether or not
> >these are to be taken as equivalent.
> >
> >I favor declaring them equivalent:
>
> So do I.

.i .uecai

I never thought I would see all the lojbo about something.  ;-)