From - Wed Feb 14 12:50:57 1996 Received: from wnt.dc.lsoft.com (wnt.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.7]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id JAA17336 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:54:42 -0500 Message-Id: <199602131454.JAA17336@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by wnt.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.0a) with SMTP id 3DA593F0 ; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 9:18:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 05:41:49 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: query: jvoterbri To: pbarreto@UNISYS.COM.BR Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Status: O X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 1105 >> I didn't understand the place structure symbols in the lujvo list, >> although I do understand those appearing in the gismu list. Could >> you explain them? > >.i .oi na go'i. In fact, I've never paid much attention to them, and I've >had time to read the jvoplace paper. Could someone help us? It would be difficult to understand them without reading Nick's versio n of the place structure paper (I presume that Cowan has preserved the info as wel l, but am not sure.) The items are references to the place structure of the gismu of the defining tanru, and = means that two such places are assumed to be conjoined into one place in the lujvo. We have an automated expansion of the lujvo list that is much more understandable processed for use in the dictionary. If it weren't so incredibly large, I would upload it, since that is the version that people will be seeing after the dictionary is published. I had hoped to have added the newer lujvo to the list before doing so, but Jorge got only a fraction of the way through the list before he had to quit. lojbab