From - Wed Feb 14 12:54:08 1996 Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id EAA15354 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 04:55:04 -0500 Message-Id: <199602140955.EAA15354@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 660FAA4F ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 4:21:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 04:19:32 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: Existing ways to fuzz To: ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Status: O X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 555 >lojbab: >> Our goal wqas originally, and remains, to get a documented language out >> there and use it. If it has some weakenesses, then we will address >> that problem when we know what it is. > >How will you/we address that problem? We will address THAT problem as well when we know what IT is. Anything done officially by LLG, will have to be approved by the members of LLG and/or the Board. Otherwise, there are no plans. And nothing post- baseline has ever been on an LLG meeting agenda. For obvious reasons, i hope. lojbab