From - Tue Feb 27 12:17:08 1996
Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id TAA22110 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 19:31:00 -0500
Message-Id: <199602270031.TAA22110@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 3C271874 ; Mon, 26 Feb 1996 18:53:52 -0500
Date:         Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:14:05 -0700
Reply-To: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Subject:      Re: short intemperate response to Lojbab on {kea}
To:         lojban@cuvmb.bitnet
Status: U
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  548


And:
>{kea} in prenex of the main bridi within to..toi refers to a bridi the
>parenthesis is within.
>
>> We have nei/no'a/la'edei for what I think you are trying for.
>
>I doubt it. I'd have thought {dei} refers to the current utterance, while
>{nei} refers to current bridi and {noa} to next outer bridi. None of these
>will cover the function of {kea}.

I would think that la'eno'a, inside the to...toi, would have to be
interpreted as the bridi within which the to..toi occur.  That's what "next
outer" suggests to me, anyway.