Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA13415 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Sun, 18 Feb 1996 07:02:17 -0500
Message-Id: <199602181202.HAA13415@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id B587EBC8 ; Sun, 18 Feb 1996 6:27:58 -0500
Date:         Sun, 18 Feb 1996 11:26:38 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: VRC: existing ways to fuzz?
To:         lojban@cuvmb.columbia.edu
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 797
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Feb 20 15:05:32 1996
X-From-Space-Address: -

> > ask them what its essential features
> > are, then you may get conflicting answers. Ask, say, jimc and Goran.
> Something people can and do use; not [too much] entangled with particular
> cultures (particularly being careful to resist the dominant position of
> English); feasible for machine parsing and analysis; much less complex
> than others; well documented; better attuned to the lessons of formal logic
> than other languages [even though I have complaints about certain areas].
>                -- jimc

Well that's me buggered then, isn't it, since Goran said virtually the
same thing. I would quote what he said, but it's gone missing. (If I'd
realized anyone but lojbab actually reads what I write maybe I'd have
been a bit more prudently hedgey...) O well. coo, feo, feo, mie and