Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id VAA06556 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:50:03 +0200 Message-Id: <199602141950.VAA06556@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 775B1B0A ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 20:49:58 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 14:46:48 -0500 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Organization: Lojban Peripheral Subject: Re: loglan rapprochement orthography To: Lojban List Content-Length: 714 Lines: 18 la .iVAN. cusku di'e > What, there is a Lojban Cyrillic orthography by me? Wow. I wonder > what other remarkable things I've done and forgotten everything about. > > But since it's mine, even though I don't remember making it, I'm going > to make a slight alteration in it: Let {'} be written {'} in Cyrillic > as well as Latin. So mote it be. > Whatever it is phonetically, it is structurally not > a consonant (it can't be one of the {C}s in {CVCCV}, {CCV} and all the > other formulae), so I'd rather keep it graphically distinct from them > as well. (This is also an argument against {h} in Roman.) doi .and., please take note. This is the point we've been trying to make and (apparently) failing to.