Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id CAA02959 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 02:38:14 -0500
Message-Id: <199602190738.CAA02959@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id EFFA958F ; Mon, 19 Feb 1996 2:03:34 -0500
Date:         Mon, 19 Feb 1996 07:01:47 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: Accents for apostrophes?
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 354
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Feb 20 15:07:06 1996
X-From-Space-Address: -

Kris:
> For your example sentence, {.itu'e ro ma'arbi'i ba galtu} we could write:
>        {.itu=E9 ro ma=E1rbi=ED ba galtu}

I'm all in favour of experimentation, but this suggestion even I find
a bit too baroque. It looks almost Irish. It's a bit hard to remember
that {ma=E1rbi=ED} is pronounced maharbihi rather than, say, ma-eirbi-ed.

zoo, mie and