Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id VAA19948 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 21:21:16 +0200 Message-Id: <199602071921.VAA19948@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 4BD3B86C ; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 20:21:16 +0100 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 14:51:08 -0500 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO) To: Lojban List Content-Length: 1148 Lines: 31 I am now proposing the addition of two conventions for handling fuzzy logic: 1) for fuzzy truth statements, a convention that "je'a xi " reflects the degree of truth of the statement in which it is embedded, thus: 1) mi je'a xi pinomu blanu I am (5%-true) blue. This is distinct from saying I have a 5% probability of being blue; probability does not enter into it. A die has a 1/6 probability of coming up deuce, but it does so with a degree of truth that is 1 (with 1/6 probability) or 0 (with 5/6 probability): not fuzzy at all. I had previously proposed this convention. Claims using this convention can be rewritten to use "jei" thus: da je'a xi broda = le jei da broda du li 2) for scalar claims generally, a new cmavo of selma'o MOI (for discussion purposes, "fiu'i"), with tentative place structure: x1 is at location on scale x2 (of type x3?) I'm not sure if x3 is useful; it is meant to be filled with things like "cardinal", "interval", etc. Comments? -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.