Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA23229 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 13:14:53 +0200 Message-Id: <199602081114.NAA23229@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 8E3FE4D8 ; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 12:15:10 +0100 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 06:13:50 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: repost from a "newbie" who isn't X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 2016 Lines: 40 Private comment from not-so-newbie Dave Barton, who gives permission for me to repost: >As someone who is getting involved again after a long absence, and is >facing learning the language virtually from scratch, I find myself >agreeing with your view more and more as time goes on. Frankly, as a >computer languge designer (and not a spoken language designer), I came >into this with a bias towards an academy. I work extensively in the >IEEE standards game, and know the mechanisms of such bodies quite >well. It is a familiar mechanism for me, and in the absence of this >discussion I would probably have accepted an academy by default. > >However, I *know* that if I had learned the language as best I could >from the textbook and refgrammar, and then found a bunch of new stuff >I had to learn as well, it would be very discouraging. I don't know >if it would put me off entirely, but it *would* make me hesitate. >What do I study? If I do this or that, will I have to simply unlearn >it later? These kinds of reflections are effort and motivation >killing. I am grateful to have a relatively stable corpus (even if >the "baseline" hasn't *really* started). > >And, believe me, I *know* that your description of what happens with >an academy, where the papers of the academy become de facto part of >the language regardless of the baseline, is in fact what happens (at >--More-- >least in computer languages). I have watched it happen. No one wants >to be left behind; everyone tries to pick up the latest. > >So, in spite of myself, I am on your side in this particular debate. >Feel free to quote this in whole or in part, as you would wish; I >don't want to stick my nose out as a newbie on the full list, but if >you think anything I say would be worth while, feel free to refer to >it or post it. > > > Dave Barton <*> > dlb@wash.inmet.com )0( > http://www.inmet.com/~dlb lojbab