From - Mon Feb 26 10:37:03 1996 Received: from access4.digex.net (ql/6O0AY1b.Cw@access4.digex.net [205.197.245.195]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA22194 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 1996 07:45:11 -0500 Received: (from lojbab@localhost) by access4.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id HAA18437 ; for ; Sun, 25 Feb 1996 07:09:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1996 07:09:46 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199602251209.HAA18437@access4.digex.net> To: lojbab@access.digex.net, veion@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi Subject: Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message Cc: cowan@ccil.org, pcliffje@crl.com X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 843 >Termsets: > > After some more thought I think the following will work -- but for > forethought connected termsets only: Which is what we have now. >terms_80 : term_81 > | terms_80 term_81 > | term_81 links_161 > | GEK_807 term_81 links_161 GIK_816 term_81 >links_161 > ; Again, I will wait to see what Cowan, pc (John starts getting ambiguous even in this limited group %^), and Nora say. If we reach some consensus, we can go to the list for comment. Unless there is a forethought JOIK somewhere in the works, we would lose JOIK termsets. I like eliminating the special termset words and simplifying the grammar but this may be too complicated to make sure we aren't leaving holes. lojbab