Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id GAA21287 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 06:25:59 -0500 Message-Id: <199602151125.GAA21287@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 10C19BE3 ; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 5:43:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 05:40:44 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals X-To: dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 995 X-From-Space-Date: Thu Feb 15 10:22:35 1996 X-From-Space-Address: - >> and I want to say >> "It is 10 m from here". I'd say "ko'a zvati [fe'e]xe'i lo mitre be li >> pano" (I still don't know if fe'e is necessary, but no other tense works >> both spatially and temporally, so I'm putting it in just in case). >> xorxes would use {va lo mitre...}, > >"ko'a valo mitre beli pano zvati" is right on the money. Whether the grammar >was constructed with this in mind or not, I understand it exactly and it is >what I would use. You need a terminator there - you have a mitre ... zvati inside the va-tagged space, hence have stated 2 sumti without a selbri. This construct works, but not usiversally, since it is dependent on assuming that an interval for the tagged sumti is interpreted differently in semantics than any other sumti value. But the alternate interpretation, though less likely, is viable in some contexts: "ko'a valo mitre beli pano cu zvati x, a bit away from some 10 meter interval, is located. X is staying away from the 10 meter limit. lojbab