Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id RAA08802 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:49:20 +0200 Message-Id: <199602101549.RAA08802@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 2FC01743 ; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:49:20 +0100 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 10:47:18 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: *old response on experienced Lojbanists X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 1869 Lines: 44 >From: Steve Hazel >Subject: RET: Who are you? > >I was just wondering who "the experienced" are ... specifically those >who can use the language well and are possibly even approaching >fluency... *shrug* At the risk of leaving some people out, and mixing different sorts of fluency, I would certainly include John Cowan Lojbab and Nora Nick Nicholas Jorge Llambias Ivan Derzhanski Goran Topic Colin Fine Sylvia Rutiser Chris Bogart as among the most fluent users of the language, with pc being a former and hopefully future member of this set. Mark Shoulson and Iain Alexander are probably also at this level, but are usually inactive. Albion Zeglin of the local Lojban class is sometimes at this level but drops in and out of the community. Athelstan was at that level before his head injury and has not yet regained anywhere near his former skill. There is a second tier of people who have written or conversed in the language to some considerable extent, have demonstrated therefore that they have a basic grasp of the grammar, but usually have had significant limitations due to weak command of the vocabulary or a lack of systematic study. I would guess that as many as 50 people now have written or spoken good Lojban text that is not trivial translation from English or some other language but indicates an understanding of the grammar basics. Sometimes, as with And Rosta or Jim Carter, these people have ideas that run contrary to the mainstream of Lojban usage or theory and hence can easily confuse others by their explanations or usages. I count 2 dozen people I would put in this category among the 110 email addresses on the December 12 Lojban List, and I may be missing some of the new people who have conversed in Lojban on the list in the last few months, since I haven't been paying attention. lojbab