Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id KAA05125 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:55:50 +0200
Message-Id: <199602140855.KAA05125@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 11D96D99 ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 9:55:44 +0100
Date:         Wed, 14 Feb 1996 03:54:46 -0500
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: doubleplusungood quality
X-To:         sbelknap@UIC.EDU
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 335
Lines: 128

>Oh. I see what you mean. Yes. "doubleplusungood quality" is a two term
>tanru where the first term exemplifies the second rather tha restricts it.
>Actually, how *do* you do that in lojban (distinguish this usage from the
>restrictive usage)?

I have in the past stuck in a "klesi",making it
doubleplusungood-category-quality

lojbab