Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id EAA13876 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 04:01:06 -0500 Message-Id: <199602140901.EAA13876@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id DDEC5D19 ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 3:27:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:25:27 +0200 Reply-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Sender: Lojban list From: Veijo Vilva Subject: Re: tech: logic matters X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: O X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 1036 X-From-Space-Date: Wed Feb 14 12:53:32 1996 X-From-Space-Address: - la and cusku di'e > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:28:36 +0000 > From: ucleaar > Subject: Re: tech: logic matters > > > The equivalence of ro lo and roda poi certainly never was adopted but > > was one of the multiple conflicting proposals of the endless "any" > > discussion that never got resolved. > > It was the consensus view, and the only coherent one put forward at > the time. Of course, I am now opposed to it, so I will gladly subscribe > to your version of recent history. > > coo, mie and I, for one, was never happy with the equivalencing of 'ro lo' and 'ro da poi'. I had always felt that veridicality and existential import ought to be separated - and I'd have been very reluctant to give up the veridicality of 'lo' (I was/am even inclined to consider 'lo' opaque). But let's not get involved in the "any" discussion any more - I had enough of that. -- co'o mi'e veion --------------------------------- .i mi du la'o sy. Veijo Vilva sy. ---------------------------------