Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA12257 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 11:51:09 +0200 Message-Id: <199602130951.LAA12257@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id A4F2E50E ; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 10:51:08 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 04:50:15 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals X-To: topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 1299 Lines: 34 >> without going into aracnaities like >> ca'o le puzi nanca belipimu > >during the close-past .5-year > >This can, on the other hand, mean that I went to Glasgow a week ago, >since that was also during a recent half-year. No go. > >Something in that line almost works, though: > >... co'a le puzi nanca belipimu That was my intent - at the inception of the previous adjacent 6 month period. >But I find it clumsy. Less so than using temci, but also less precise. Not sure why it seems less precise. Inchoative is a point event. and we are define the point by means of the interval. Clumsy - well that is an aesthetic consideration and one you may be better able to make than I. Especially since you are a native speaker of a language with perfectives. BTW>> ca'o le puzi nanca belipimu > >during the close-past .5-year should mean under perfective languages that I went throughout the close-past .5 year, and hence that I was in Glasgow for the last 6 months, not for a short period within that 6 months. At least from my Russian understandings the use of a perfective when describing two events means that they coexist in time, and I have read at least the strong implication that one even is not substantially different in time spread than the other. Is this true for Croatian? lojbab