From - Wed Feb 14 12:53:57 1996
Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id EAA14124 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 04:29:16 -0500
Message-Id: <199602140929.EAA14124@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id C7C61960 ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 3:55:44 -0500
Date:         Wed, 14 Feb 1996 03:54:46 -0500
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: doubleplusungood quality
To:         sbelknap@UIC.EDU
Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: O
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  348


>Oh. I see what you mean. Yes. "doubleplusungood quality" is a two term
>tanru where the first term exemplifies the second rather tha restricts it.
>Actually, how *do* you do that in lojban (distinguish this usage from the
>restrictive usage)?

I have in the past stuck in a "klesi",making it
doubleplusungood-category-quality

lojbab