Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id TAA14821 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 19:02:13 -0500 Message-Id: <199602060002.TAA14821@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by vms.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id F63BDB85 ; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 17:00:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 18:55:39 -0300 Reply-To: "Jorge J. Llambias" Sender: Lojban list From: "Jorge J. Llambias" Subject: Re: Politics X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 1330 X-From-Space-Date: Mon Feb 5 19:02:15 1996 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU > (Indeed in Jorge's >comment the other day supporting discussions of changes taking place in Lojban, >he used a ke'a that I THINK was legit, but the sheer fact that he has so >lodly advocated the alternative caused me to look several times over the >sentence to make sure that it wasnt the other kind of ke'a - with the >result that I gave up understanding the sentence because I couldn't keep it >all in my head at once whil;e doing such analysis.) i mi xenru le du'u tu'a mi rinka le nu cfipu i e'u ca le balvi do sruma le du'u mi pilno zo ke'a ta'i le du'u do jimpe makau i va'o le nu mi na co'e cu gendra ji'a i e'e do smadi lo paroi smuni i la'a do drani > I am >also reasonably sure that Jorge at the very least will ask that it be an >agenda item for the next Logfest,a nd that the issue will be formally or >informally disucssed in a forum that includes the most "noisy" of the >status-quo proponents. i la'anai mi ba ka'e zvati la logfest poi bavlamji iku'i va'o le nu mi go'i kei mi na steci se cinri le di'u cuntu i pe'i lo bangu kamni ca zasti i ro prenu poi pagbu le skamymriste cu cmima le kamni i pe'i ri na ba canci ca le nu le gerna pe la kau,n cu peljybi'o i xu da ca'a krici le du'u ba le nu peljybi'o kei ro selmri cu se finti bau la lojban gi'e srana na'ebo la lojban i mi mitce senpi co'o mi'e xorxes