Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id EAA15235 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 04:42:10 -0500
Message-Id: <199602140942.EAA15235@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 99EFFA53 ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 4:08:47 -0500
Date:         Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:02:20 +0100
Reply-To: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Subject:      Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: O
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 663
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Feb 14 12:54:03 1996
X-From-Space-Address: -

> My try would be
> mi klama la glazgov. co'a lo nanca belipimu poi prulamji lenu xabju la
 belfast.
>
> Anyone buying???

So, if you don't specify the distance, you say

mi klama gy. pu lenu xabju by.

and, if you want to specify the distance, you say

mi klama gy. co'a ny. poi prulamji lenu xabju by.

Are you aware that just that little difference made you throw away all
of the nifty imaginary journeys devices (not counting the aspectuals
(?))? Why bother with PU at all, if you can do it with
purci/balvi/cabna? Why bother with ZEhA, if you can do it with NAhE
clani temci? Why have mo'i FAhA? There is always muvdu be lo
bersa/trixe...

co'o mi'e. goran.