Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id LAA28660 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 11:17:13 -0500 Message-Id: <199602121617.LAA28660@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 8F99F60B ; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 13:59:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 13:57:37 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: SNU: leader?!? (PU: *old response to Steven B #4) X-To: topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 998 X-From-Space-Date: Mon Feb 12 11:17:15 1996 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU >you perhaps mean "leader" as in {lidne} and not {turni}? go'i >But I don't seem to manage making anybody else use the >wretched language. :) nago'i I think there has been MUCH more use of the language since you got involved thna there was before you, Goran. You have led by example, which is one of the best wasy to do so. But to get people like me to have TIME to read your posts, we need to get books done. It is not that I do not WANT to read an write Lojban, but that if I took the time to do so, even less would get done than at present. What I really need to do is ween myself from longwinded arguments. I am fairly sure that I will not convince Steven, nor is he coming close to convincing me. Hopefully SOMEONME is getting something out of the discussion, other than a state of exhaustion or disgust or both. > I can't even make people read my messages.) Your English messages get read by me. I wish I could read the Lojban ones. We will get there. Hopefully very soon. lojbab