Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA17542 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 07:54:23 -0500
Message-Id: <199602141254.HAA17542@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 72399F89 ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 7:20:56 -0500
Date:         Wed, 14 Feb 1996 12:00:45 GMT
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
Content-Length: 403
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Feb 20 14:57:40 1996
X-From-Space-Address: -

> .i mi klama la glazgov. pulenu xabju la belfast. ku xe'ilo nanca belipimu
> .i mi klama la glazgov. pulenu xabju la belfast. ku zanoi nanca belipimu

To my mind these are heavy-weight.  The simplest and cleanest solution is:

    .i mi klama la glazgov. pulenu xabju la belfast. kei zalo nanca belipimu

I can't think of any other possible interpretation for the sumti which follows
ZA.

co'omi'e dn.