From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Mon Feb  5 00:00:05 1996
Received: from wnt.dc.lsoft.com (wnt.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.7]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id XAA27524 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 23:59:54 -0500
Message-Id: <199602050459.XAA27524@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by wnt.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.0a) with SMTP id 1A0AD8A0 ; 4 Feb 1996 23:25:42 -0500
Date:         Sun, 4 Feb 1996 01:22:55 -0500
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: tech: logic matters
X-To:         ia@stryx.demon.co.uk
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  286


Looking at this exchange between pc and Iain, and guessing that I MIGHT have
an inkling as to what the discussion is about, how about reversing the
meanings and having "ro" NOT have existential import (any?) and rosu'o
be the version with existentiual import (every?)

lojbab