From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Sun Feb 11 07:00:27 1996
Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA06752 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 07:00:26 -0500
Message-Id: <199602111200.HAA06752@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 992C5B33 ; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 6:28:19 -0500
Date:         Sun, 11 Feb 1996 12:21:30 +0100
Reply-To: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Subject:      SNU: leader?!? (PU: *old response to Steven B #4)
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
Content-Length:  1030


> NO meaning that I am not abdicating leadership.  I AM abdicating as
> prescriptivist.  Leadership by example is the best kind, in my book.  I
> don't need any authority to do so.  For example, Goran has been a most
> inspiring leader by his insistance in trying to express most everything
> IN Lojban.  And he has no official role in LLG at all.

.i .e'anai ko na troci lenu mi turni .i mi ba'e xebni lenu fuzme .i to
xu do cusku lo se fanva befu zo lidne .enai zo turni .i .e'eru'e cumki
falenu mi zukte la'edi'u toi .iku'i mi sezmlu leka na snada lenu xlura
loi drata lenu pilno le .oizo'o bangu .i mi'u .e'enai mi na snada lenu
xlura loi drata lenu tcidu le selmri be mi

(Don't you try to put up me as a leader! I *hate* being responsible. Did
you perhaps mean "leader" as in {lidne} and not {turni}? I guess I do
that a bit... But I don't seem to manage making anybody else use the
wretched language. :) I can't even make people read my messages.)

co'o mi'e. goran. noi noda tcidu le selci'a be ke'a