Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id JAA00905 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 09:09:56 -0500 Message-Id: <199602081409.JAA00905@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 5DE44C3D ; Thu, 8 Feb 1996 8:39:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 07:48:29 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: loglan rapprochement orthography X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 677 X-From-Space-Date: Thu Feb 8 09:09:57 1996 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU > > Could someone please post the alternative lojban orthography > > designed to ease rapprochement with tli loglan? > In short: names and ".i" are capitalized, word-final pauses are written > as commas, word-initial pauses are either not marked or are marked by > adding a comma to the previous word, syllabic r l m n are doubled, /x/ > is written as "h", /au/ is written as "ao", apostrophes are replaced by > commas (which need not be written unless ambiguity would result, viz. > a,i e,i o,i a,o always; i,a i,e i,i i,o i,u u,a u,e u,i u,o u,u in UIs, > names, and fu'ivla). Thanks. Is this a rejected proposal, or is it an official alternative orthography? coo, mie And