Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id OAA05641 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 14:21:01 +0200
Message-Id: <199602141221.OAA05641@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id BE3835E1 ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 13:20:59 +0100
Date:         Wed, 14 Feb 1996 12:00:45 GMT
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 403
Lines: 11

> .i mi klama la glazgov. pulenu xabju la belfast. ku xe'ilo nanca belipimu
> .i mi klama la glazgov. pulenu xabju la belfast. ku zanoi nanca belipimu

To my mind these are heavy-weight.  The simplest and cleanest solution is:

    .i mi klama la glazgov. pulenu xabju la belfast. kei zalo nanca belipimu

I can't think of any other possible interpretation for the sumti which follows
ZA.

co'omi'e dn.