From - Thu Feb 15 10:23:02 1996
Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA21836 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 07:14:51 -0500
Message-Id: <199602151214.HAA21836@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 05206862 ; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 6:40:55 -0500
Date:         Thu, 15 Feb 1996 06:39:19 -0500
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals
X-To:         veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  654


>  modifier_82             :  mod_head_490  gap_450
>C                         |  mod_head_490  linked_sumti_84
>                          ;
>
>+ linked_sumti_84         :  sumti_90
>--More--
>+                         |  linked_sumti_84 BO_508 sumti_90
>+                         ;
>
>
>
>--
>
>  co'o mi'e veion

Does this work with that last line being
>>+                         |  linked_sumti_84 BO_508 modifier_82
because I think that is what is needed to make a sepi'o and a
tepi'o be linked.

I would actually have to see examples of how people would want to USE this
thing before I can judge it, of course.

lojbab