Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA05311 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 11:21:43 +0200 Message-Id: <199602140921.LAA05311@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id B2DAA8DC ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:21:42 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 04:19:32 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: Existing ways to fuzz X-To: ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 537 Lines: 14 >lojbab: >> Our goal wqas originally, and remains, to get a documented language out >> there and use it. If it has some weakenesses, then we will address >> that problem when we know what it is. > >How will you/we address that problem? We will address THAT problem as well when we know what IT is. Anything done officially by LLG, will have to be approved by the members of LLG and/or the Board. Otherwise, there are no plans. And nothing post- baseline has ever been on an LLG meeting agenda. For obvious reasons, i hope. lojbab