From lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Wed Mar 13 23:33:33 1996
Received: from punt4.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP
	id AA10829 ; Wed, 13 Mar 96 23:33:31 GMT
Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk
          id 826737539:10329:1; Wed, 13 Mar 96 17:18:59 GMT
Received: from cunyvm.cuny.edu ([128.228.1.2]) by punt-4.mail.demon.net
          id aa09783; 13 Mar 96 17:17 GMT
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
   with BSMTP id 7034; Wed, 13 Mar 96 12:17:42 EST
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with
 BSMTP id 5480; Wed, 13 Mar 96 12:18:08 EDT
Date:         Wed, 13 Mar 1996 14:26:10 -0300
Reply-To:     "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
From:         "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <826737479.9783.0@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
Status: R


la veion mi di'e spuda

>> Couldn't it be just "GEK terms /NUhU/ GIK
>> terms /NUhU/"? That would make it much more in tune with the
>> general use of geks.
>
>   This would work at the yacc level
>
>> (Even better if the first NUhU could be avoided.)
>
>   1 shift/reduce conflict

Is it possible to identify when this happens? When a {gi} is found,
the only possibility is that it is closing the latest open gek,
isn't it? In other words, under what circumstances would the first
nu'u not be elidable?

Jorge