Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id QAA20040 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:49:55 -0500
Message-Id: <199603012149.QAA20040@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 50833B06 ; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:12:12 -0500
Date:         Fri, 1 Mar 1996 20:01:16 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
X-UIDL: 825717441.000
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      fiui
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: U
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
Content-Length: 501
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Mar 04 09:36:11 1996
X-From-Space-Address: -

Steven appears to be getting excited about {fiui} as a way to do what
he's been wanting to. It may well do what he wants, but if so then even
without {fiui} there have existed ways to do {fiui}'s work. {fiui} is
in MOI. Every MOI can be translated into a suitable lujvo with an extra
{li} sumti. So, if {fiui} does the trick then there was no need for
Steven to agitate for it: the resources - i.e. a lujvo scarcely more
verbose than {fiui} - already existed (potentially) to do the job.
coo, mie and