From - Wed Mar 13 12:47:28 1996 Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id MAA13575 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:41:31 -0500 Message-Id: <199603131741.MAA13575@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id EC3DFF57 ; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:27:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 14:26:10 -0300 Reply-To: "Jorge J. Llambias" Sender: Lojban list From: "Jorge J. Llambias" Subject: Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 533 la veion mi di'e spuda >> Couldn't it be just "GEK terms /NUhU/ GIK >> terms /NUhU/"? That would make it much more in tune with the >> general use of geks. > > This would work at the yacc level > >> (Even better if the first NUhU could be avoided.) > > 1 shift/reduce conflict Is it possible to identify when this happens? When a {gi} is found, the only possibility is that it is closing the latest open gek, isn't it? In other words, under what circumstances would the first nu'u not be elidable? Jorge