From lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Thu Mar 14 00:05:59 1996 Received: from punt4.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA10836 ; Thu, 14 Mar 96 00:05:50 GMT Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 826785792:17894:1; Thu, 14 Mar 96 06:43:12 GMT Received: from cunyvm.cuny.edu ([128.228.1.2]) by punt-4.mail.demon.net id aa17771; 14 Mar 96 6:43 GMT Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 9880; Thu, 14 Mar 96 01:42:39 EST Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 9008; Thu, 14 Mar 96 01:43:07 EDT Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 08:30:49 +0200 Reply-To: Veijo Vilva Sender: Lojban list From: Veijo Vilva Subject: Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN Message-ID: <826785781.17771.0@cunyvm.cuny.edu> Status: R > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 22:50:29 +0200 > From: Veijo Vilva > Subject: Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 2$i > --- in the rules for term_set_83 replace > > GEK_807 terms_80 GIK_816 NUhU_gap_460 > terms_80 NUhU_gap_460 > > with > > GEK_807 terms_80 term_81 GIK_816 > terms_80 term_81 NUhU_gap_460 > > Now, a termset must have at least two terms. This has the weakness compared to the present grammar that single non-sumti terms cannot be connected. Allowing single terms here caused a conflict with rule sumti_D_94 : GEK sumti GIK sumti. The following modification will allow the connection of single terms: term_81 : sumti_90 | term_81_A ; term_81_A : modifier_82 | term_set_83 | NA_KU_810 ; Add the following line to the rules for term_set_83: GEK_807 term_81_A GIK_816 term_81_A NUhU_gap_460 The NUhU isn't absolutely necessary -- only it must either be always required or always omitted. co'o mi'e veion --------------------------------- .i mi du la'o sy. Veijo Vilva sy. ---------------------------------