Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id LAA17441 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 11:50:58 -0500 Message-Id: <199603031650.LAA17441@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id C5DA7AF7 ; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 11:12:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 11:11:42 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: bnf and yacc X-To: sbelknap@UIC.EDU X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 1035 X-From-Space-Date: Mon Mar 04 09:39:30 1996 X-From-Space-Address: - >where are the latest and greatest, truest and best bnf and yacc >specification for lojban? The version on the ftp and WWW pages is the official release. But there are now a dozen or so proposed changes sitting unapproved, as well as a set of typo corrections to both the BNF and the YACC grammar, such that the official version cannot any longer be called the "best" version - just the only one worth looking at for now until we get a new approved version. The baseline version of the moment is labelled 2.35. I still am using 2.33 since the parsewr I have corresonds to that version, and there is at least one way in which the 2.35 parser blows up that has not been debugged. At last report, Cowan had numbered change proposals up to 2.45, with one of the set rejected. Only Cowan and maybe Veijo have seen a version of the YACC grammar incorporating all the changes, and I am waiting for same myself before casting my votes on the changes. There is no parser that incorporates the proposed changes, as far as I know. lojbab