From - Wed Apr 03 10:35:12 1996
Reply-To: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Date: Wed Apr 03 10:35:12 1996
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: change 46
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  549
Message-ID: <su5iDqLYYX.A.rCC.460kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>


pc:
> (By the way, why does no one ever point out that le q is
> always on an independent branch?)

There was a discussion on something related a while back.
What does {le re nanmu cu cinba le ri speni} mean? Is it
"each of the two men kisses his (own) spouse", or "each of
the two men kisses their (common) spouse"? I'm inclined to
think it is the first, but I don't think there ever was an
authoritative answer about that. (If it is the first, that
would be an example where {le} isn't on an independent branch,
I think.)

Jorge