From lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Mon Aug 05 00:26:21 1996
Received: from punt4.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP
	id AA13650 ; Mon, 05 Aug 96 00:26:11 BST
Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk
          id 839102098:13392:1; Sat, 03 Aug 96 20:54:58 BST
Received: from cunyvm.cuny.edu ([128.228.1.2]) by punt-4.mail.demon.net
          id aa12808; 3 Aug 96 20:54 +0100
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
   with BSMTP id 0055; Sat, 03 Aug 96 15:53:56 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with
 BSMTP id 3060; Sat, 03 Aug 96 11:01:07 EDT
Date:         Sat, 3 Aug 1996 16:59:15 +0200
Reply-To:     Frank.Mayer@darmstadt.netsurf.de
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
From:         Frank Mayer <Frank.Mayer@DARMSTADT.NETSURF.DE>
Subject:      Mail identification
X-To:         LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Message-ID: <839102050.12808.0@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
Status: R


Please excuse this intrusion in your mailbox. This message is meant
solely for the list owner (although others may feel called upon to
express their own opinions).

I wonder whether it would be possible to mark the subject of mail
distributed within the lojban list with a lojban topical identifier (for
instance, concatentated onto the subject). Like many people I
participate in several lists, and mail related to lojban arriving
without clear content identification is ambiguous. Rather ironic for an
interest group that strives for complete logical clarity, isn't it?

Thanks for giving this matter your consideration!


FM