From lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Fri Aug 02 22:58:18 1996
Received: from punt4.demon.co.uk by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP
	id AA13583 ; Fri, 02 Aug 96 22:58:16 BST
Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk
          id 838945215:00664:0; Fri, 02 Aug 96 01:20:15 BST
Received: from cunyvm.cuny.edu ([128.228.1.2]) by punt-4.mail.demon.net
          id aa00191; 2 Aug 96 1:19 +0100
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
   with BSMTP id 2783; Thu, 01 Aug 96 20:18:51 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with
 BSMTP id 1386; Thu, 01 Aug 96 20:18:40 EDT
Date:         Thu, 1 Aug 1996 19:16:58 +0100
Reply-To:     Steven Belknap <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
From:         Steven Belknap <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
Subject:      wind at your back
To:           Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Message-ID: <838945149.191.0@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
Status: R


>>>>"May circumstances always assist you like a tailwind assists a ship".
>>>
>>>Yes!!
>>>A compromise with the best of both worlds. A metaphor and a clear
>>>description of the meaning. The best yet, anyway, in my opinion.
>>
>>
>>No! This is a simile not a metaphor. Similes are easy to translate between
>>languages, as a simile explicitly links the essentially unlike things which
>>are to be compared. Metaphors are implicit. I would look askance at
>>translating metaphor as simile. They are different. Metaphor draws on the
>>shared culture, knowledge, or language of the speaker and listener more
>>than simile does.
>
>But Lojban assumes that there is NO shared culture or language shared between
> speaker and listener other than Lojban (I will not make statements about
>shared
>knowledge, except that the speaker has the obligation to cater to the
>listener's
>knowledge according to our language "ethic".)
>
>Simile, and metaphor , and other such terms are words used to describe
>features of certain natural languages.  Generically,  a simile IS a kind of
>metaphor - it just happens to be a kind which is more highly marked than
>others.  "Brain fart", vs. "as if his brain farted it" mean essentially the
>same thing.  Thus it is only stylistics that determine whether simile is
>acceptable as a translation for metaphor.  As I say in another post, I
>think it is preferred to almost any other method of translating metaphor.


I think I agree with you, although I would say it differently. In natural
languages, there is a continuous spectrum of analogy constructs, varying
from pure simile to pure metaphor. In a pure simile, everything is spelled
out, while in a pure metaphor, the reader or listener has to grasp the
implicit analogy that is being made between essentially unlike things.

Metaphor: "The pilot had a brain fart and jettisoned all the jet fuel, thus
crashing the F-14 Tomahawk"
Simile:    :  "Like a fart, loudly, unpredictably, and embarrassingly
emitting from a momentarily unreliable gastrointestinal tract during high
tea with the Queen of England, the pilot's brain mistook the fuel jettison
switch for the radio switch, thus crashing the F-14 Tomahawk."

Simile & metaphor are both English words. I agree that they do not apply to
lojban utterances in a straighforward fashion. But peha ought to change to
context to a presumably shared one external to lojban, no? Doubtless, tanru
can be used to express the same simile/metaphor distinction in lojban.

-Steven