From lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Mon Oct 07 01:36:53 1996 Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA15986 ; Mon, 07 Oct 96 01:36:50 BST Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 844615934:08171:0; Sun, 06 Oct 96 16:32:14 BST Received: from cunyvm.cuny.edu ([128.228.1.2]) by punt-4.mail.demon.net id aa07328; 6 Oct 96 16:31 BST Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 7225; Sun, 06 Oct 96 11:30:59 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 1730; Sun, 06 Oct 96 11:30:46 EDT Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 11:29:29 -0400 Reply-To: Andrew Strader Sender: Lojban list From: Andrew Strader Subject: fragile place structure X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN Message-ID: <844615872.7328.0@cunyvm.cuny.edu> Status: R The policy of usage determining officialdom in the grammar seems to waver insecurely when it comes to what I've seen of bajra. Now I always like how bajra was handled, place structure-wise, but then I noticed in the self-teaching lessons it is consistently used with a place structure of "x1 runs to x2 from x3 via x4", so I shrugged it off because there were a number of such errors to be weeded out of those lessons, but then I encountered it in the reference grammar (Chapter 7, I believe), and it appears a more efficient way to communicate that one runs to two from three would be with bajra klama. If I'm looking at anomolous usage, I'd figure the usefulness of the dictionary bajra would take precedence. Also, where can I look at a general (tentative) schedule of LLG's priorities as to freezing of various levels of description, publications, and so forth. Guido