From lojban@cuvmb.bitnet Fri Oct 25 22:44:06 1996 Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by stryx.demon.co.uk with SMTP id AA16488 ; Fri, 25 Oct 96 22:44:04 BST Received: from punt-4.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 846224312:24226:1; Fri, 25 Oct 96 07:18:32 BST Received: from cunyvm.cuny.edu ([128.228.1.2]) by punt-4.mail.demon.net id aa23849; 25 Oct 96 7:18 BST Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 6788; Fri, 25 Oct 96 02:18:01 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 2967; Fri, 25 Oct 96 02:17:44 EDT Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 23:11:55 -0700 Reply-To: "William Westlake Jr." Sender: Lojban list From: "William Westlake Jr." Subject: Re: away from my mail X-To: LogLan To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN Message-ID: <846224282.23849.0@cunyvm.cuny.edu> Status: R I'll have the spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam, spam and spam. > > Looks like we overlooked a gismu for spam (the meat). Unconscionable. > I don't know much about logban yet so how would you say: "looks like meat tastes like *&^%" in logban :-)