From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:59:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Received: (qmail 3121 invoked from network); 11 Nov 1996 17:30:04 -0000 Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (192.36.125.6) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 11 Nov 1996 17:30:04 -0000 Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <14.D05E521D@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 18:30:01 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 17:25:52 GMT Reply-To: Don Wiggins Sender: Lojban list From: Don Wiggins Subject: Re: TECH: magnitude To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 813 Lines: 19 Message-ID: > I have been kicking around the idea of a new cmavo of selma'o KI, > "ki'i'i" temporarily. A sumti tcita involving this will be a specific > magnitude, thus: > 1) mi dansu le bisli ve'a ki'i'i lo mitre be li pa > I dance on the ice over-interval one-meter. > 2) mi pu klama le zarci zi ki'i'i lo mentu be li reno > I went to the store merely 20 minutes ago. > 3) mi pu klama le zarci zu ki'i'i lo mentu be li reno > I went to the store fully 20 minutes ago. For resolving the magnitude problem, I think it possible without any new grammar. So, for "I went to the store 20 minutes ago." I would use: .i mi klama lo zarci calo puzi mentu beli reno I went to the store simultaneous with the nearest-in-the-past minutes of 20. ni'o co'omi'e dn.