From - Fri Nov 22 09:21:15 1996
Reply-To: "R.M. Uittenbogaard" <reneuit@SCI.KUN.NL>
Date: Fri Nov 22 09:21:15 1996
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: "R.M. Uittenbogaard" <reneuit@SCI.KUN.NL>
Subject:      Re: place switching cmavo...
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: 900f6bcbc55ab4b4da793708704f1d5e
Status: U
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  628
Message-ID: <DdNPqU9EOkM.A.MHC.I70kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>


Lojbab wrote:

> > fo le dargu cu klama fa mi do lemi zdani fu le karce

> The "fu" is not necessary there, since the "fo" has
> already been taken care of.

I always thought the places were numbered subsequently, and

fo le dargu cu klama fa mi do lemi zdani le karce

meant that "le karce" occupies the x4 place as well, which makes
it equal in meaning to:

mi klama do lemi zdani le dargu .e le karce   ,  or
mi klama do lemi zdani le dargu fo le karce

So instead, filled places are skipped for subsequent sumti?

fo le dargu fe do klama fa mi lemi zdani le karce vau ki'a zo'o


co'o mi'e reneis