From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:58:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Received: (qmail 24597 invoked from network); 16 Dec 1996 06:58:45 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 16 Dec 1996 06:58:45 -0000 Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <12.69527961@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 7:58:39 +0100 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 01:55:44 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: CONLANG: Write-only language, part 2 X-To: dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 603 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <67A09vRXrdJ.A.B-B.q60kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org> > do poi troci lenu sisku tu'a mi >kei You who-restrictive-clause try the-event-of seeking something-to-do-with >me ... Actually, one would probably do this in Lojban as "doi troci be lenu sisku ... with an explicit do'u (probably not actually required) at the end of the vocative so people know when you've stopped identifying the audience (without parsing it) and started getting to the actual content. As a result, the zi'e noi would probably be "do'u ko (djuno ...)" or some similar form depending on what you mean by the nonrestrictive clause. lojbab