From - Wed Dec 18 15:43:29 1996
Reply-To: Chris A Bogart <cbogart@INDRA.COM>
Date: Wed Dec 18 15:43:29 1996
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Chris A Bogart <cbogart@INDRA.COM>
Subject:      Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech
To:         lojban%cuvmb.bitnet@mitvma.mit.edu
In-Reply-To:  <199612181859.LAA13931@indra.com>
X-UIDL: a812884c7a546d9a058c11be5c028be4
Status: U
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  437
Message-ID: <bleJSi-6hiF.A.y6B.i60kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>


On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, And Rosta wrote:
> If you wanted to report me saying "JC (phwoar!) is playing G"
> then you might say "La and said lickerishly that JC is playing
> G", for example. Same goes for Lojban.

Hmmm, would it be equivalent to say (in Lojban)

   La and said that (phwoar-dai) JC is playing G

placing the empathy-ized attitudinal after "lenu" or
between "le" and "nu"?  Or after "said", maybe?

co'o do'u