From LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Sat Mar  6 22:58:57 2010
Reply-To: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Date: Mon Dec 02 10:10:38 1996
From: "Jorge J. Llambias" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: short joke
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: 6c1dccd61141cb2d8caf55454f8aae1b
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 773
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Dec 02 10:10:38 1996
X-From-Space-Address: -
Message-ID: <D-taYPzW8ID.A.hAC.x60kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la reneis cusku di'e

>Herman Finkers is a dutch comedian, who once told the following story:
>
>lei remna pujeca na'e .oiro'i nuntirna jimpe fi lemi selcusku
>isemu'ibo mi puki klama le nunbacru ctuca mikce
>i mi cusku <<lu doi mikce lei remna pujeca na'e .oiro'i nuntirna
>jimpe fi lemi selcusku li'u>>
>i <<lu je'a go'i .i je'a go'i li'u>> se cusku ny. i <<lu cabdei ke
>melbi tcima li'u>>

i u'isai

>(Should I use ny. or my. to refer to "nunbacru ctuca mikce"?

I would use my, but I don't remember us having a fixed rule yet.

>And would it be better to use a lujvo here?)

As you like. I prefer the tanru, which is very clear.

(I think you should say {na'e ke nuntirna jimpe}, otherwise {na'e}
only negates the {nuntirna} bit.)

>co'o mi'e reneis

co'o mi'e xorxes