From LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Sat Mar  6 22:59:01 2010
Reply-To: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Date: Wed Dec 18 10:19:52 1996
From: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Organization: University of Central Lancashire
Subject:      Re: lojban imperfections?
X-To:         LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: 43c740a2cb7baf3a5c984c379745d198
Status: U
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 379
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Dec 18 10:19:52 1996
X-From-Space-Address: -
Message-ID: <SF7G7leiLNL.A.xBC.160kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> As for why most of the Lojban utterances generated to date are
> predicate-medial rather than predicate-final, well, that may have
> something to do with the [native English speaker]hood of most of
> the present population of Lojbanistan; but no one has to follow suit.

As I recall, the Bradford dialect of Lojban of some years ago
tended to be predicate-final.

coo, mie And